Search Results for "oral intimation"

1294 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1294 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live Link. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974 Set Aside as Delay Between Last Smuggling Activity and Order Was Unexplained.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Joshy Mathew, challenged the detention order dated 3rd May 2004 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pilots' Challenge to Command Training Selection in Air India — No Violation of Articles 14 and 16 Found. Selection based on seniority and merit was not arbitrary; employer's decision to withdraw earlier offer was justified due to operational exigencies.

The petitioners, pilots of Air India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30th September 2004 by wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Dishonour of Cheques Issued in Discharge of Liability — Service of Notice by Registered Post Deemed Sufficient Despite Return as Undelivered.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Summary Judgment in Commercial Contract Dispute. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Purchase Order Held Inapplicable as No Cause of Action Arose at Stipulated Venue.

The respondent, Shell Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the appellant, Aglowm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition in Development Dispute — Directs Deposit of Rs.12.5 Crores and Appointment of Court Receiver. Clause 6 of MOU for Refund on Default Forms Basis for Interim Relief Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, four individuals, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the respondent, a developer, on 29 July 2011 for development ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SDO Order Remanding Sawmill Fine Case for Fresh Panchnama. Tahsildar's fine for illegal timber possession set aside due to lack of proper enquiry and violation of natural justice.

The petitioner, Vasant Govind Rajguru, a sawmill owner in Jamkhed, Ahmednagar, challenged the order dated 05.01.2012 passed by the Sub Divisional Offi...