Search Results for "muddemal"

901 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 901 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramesh Waman Bodke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No.271/2012 for the murder of his cousin Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves four criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 278 of 2016, con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Bail by Same Court - Sessions Court Cannot Cancel Its Own Bail Order Under Section 439(2) CrPC. The court held that the Additional Sessions Judge lacked jurisdiction to cancel its own bail order, as only a higher court can exercise such power.

The petitioner, Ravindra s/o Mansingh Jadhav, was granted bail by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 10.06.2022 in Criminal Bail Application...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 120-B, 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a chance witness with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The case pertains to the murder of Gurunath Jagdev Katare on 13th October 2014. The prosecution case relied heavily on the testimony of PW-1 Shivling ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 498-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Santosh Balu Mali, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his wife Suman, under Sections 302, 201, and 498-A of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The present appeal challenges the legality of the judgment and order dated 22.08.2013 passed by the learned Sessions Court, Pune, in Sessions Case No....