Search Results for "mobile phone records"

504 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 504 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Kidnapping of Minor - Seven-Year Sentence Affirmed. Consistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 363 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Balaji Maruti Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellant in Murder Appeal Citing Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a criminal appeal against the judgment of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Vijayapur, convicting the appellant unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Quashing Petitions Against Multiple FIRs Registered Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Challenge Focuses on Validity of FIR Registration Based on Request to Court Rather Than on Complaint Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.

The matter comprised three criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Sri Prabhu Shankar, an Assistant Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Applicants' Application to Quash FIR and Criminal Proceedings in Alleged Abetment of Suicide Case. Dying Declaration Exonerating Accused Does Not Preclude Trial When Contemporaneous Messages Suggest Pressure and Fabricated Identity by Applicant No. 3.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, dismissed a criminal application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Petition to Quash Matrimonial Cruelty and Dowry Case. Husband Challenges Criminal Proceedings Alleging Vague Allegations and Abuse of Process.

The petition was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of criminal proceedings pending in C.C.No.19072/202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder of Government Officials in RTO Office Shooting. Conviction Under IPC Sections 302, 307, 332, 333, 201 and Arms Act Sections 3 and 25 Challenged; Trial Court Had Sentenced Appellant to Life Imprisonment.

The case pertains to a shooting incident on 30th May 2009 at the Regional Transport Office (RTO) in Aurangabad. The appellant's father, Rameshwar Taya...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Failure to Prove Victim's Age. Conviction under Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 376(2)(i) and 376(2)(j) IPC set aside as prosecution could not establish minority of victim.

The appellant, Maherban Hasan Babu Khan, was convicted by the Special Court at Mangaon, District Raigad, for offences under Sections 4 and 6 of the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Recovery and Inadmissibility of Confessional Statements. Court Holds That Confessional Statements Under Section 67 NDPS Act Are Inadmissible and That Absence of Contraband Recovery and Inconclusive Test Reports Weigh in Favor of Bail.

The Supreme Court dealt with two special leave petitions arising from a common judgment of the Madras High Court concerning bail under the Narcotic Dr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(a)/4, 5(i),(j)(ii),(l)/6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sameer Shashikant Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Special Case No.19/2018 for offences under Sect...