Search Results for "irrelevant materials"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "irrelevant materials"

806 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 806 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Bridge Construction Dispute — No Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses regarding fixed and variable costs, finding no patent illegality or perversity.

23 Sep 2022

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a Single Judge's order dismissing a Section 34 pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Workman Status in Industrial Dispute. Tribunal's finding that employee was a 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 upheld as not perverse.

5 Jul 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Procter and Gamble Health Limited (formerly Merck Ltd.), challenged an award dated 28.02.2020 passed by the Industrial Tribunal a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT. Tribunal's order set aside for failing to consider the TPO's detailed analysis and rejecting comparables without proper reasoning under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

27 Feb 2020

The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 6 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Stop Work Notice and Demolition Order in Cantonment Area — Holds That Repair of Old Grant Bungalow Does Not Require Prior Permission Under Revised Land Policy of 1995.

16 Oct 2020

The petitioners, legal heirs of late Smt. Homai Nussarwanji Pudumjee, were occupancy holders of bungalow No.6, Maneckji Mehta Road, Pune, an old grant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Ex-Judicial Officer Challenging Dismissal for Misconduct. Departmental inquiry found to be fair and charges proved, upholding dismissal under Rule 5 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979.

24 Jan 2012

The petitioner, a former judicial officer, challenged his dismissal from service by an order dated 31 October 2006 passed by the Joint Secretary in th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Claimants' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 150 per sq.mt with Additional Benefits. Claimants entitled to 12% additional market value under Section 23(1A) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 which was erroneously denied by Reference Court.

10 Apr 2012

The case involves two appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings for extension of Civil Hospital in Solapur. The property, CTS No.617 1B admeas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cooperative Housing Society's Petition for Mandamus to Demolish Staircase for Fire Access. Court holds that the Society failed to establish any legal right or breach of statutory duty by MMRDA or other authorities regarding open space requirements under Development Control Regulations.

19 Jun 2019

The Petitioner, Bhavya Height Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sanction for Prosecution Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Sanctioning Authority's Application of Mind Not Vitiated by Non-Supply of Documents. The court held that Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 does not require supply of documents to the accused before grant of sanction, and the sanction order was valid as the authority had perused the relevant material.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, who were employees of a public sector undertaking, filed a writ petition challenging the sanction for prosecution granted under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Retracted Statement Not Considered. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Retraction of Confession.

11 Jan 2005

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Iqbal Yusuf Suleman, challenged the detention order dated 20.4.2004 passed by the detaining authority under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders in Red Sanders Smuggling Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as detaining authority did not consider whether bail conditions or other measures would suffice.

28 Jun 2013

The Bombay High Court allowed two habeas corpus petitions challenging preventive detention orders dated 21 February 2013 issued under Section 3(1) of ...

41 42 43 44 45

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)