Search Results for "interest under Section 30(4)"

763 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 763 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Adjudicates Civil Revision Application in Eviction Proceeding under Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954. Landlord's contention of alternate accommodation by tenant and willful default were key issues.

The dispute centered on a shop admeasuring 15' x 20' ft. out of House No.1270/6 at Gunj Golai, Latur, owned by the late Vishwambhar Kulkarni. After hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Love affair disapproval leads to abduction and murder; conviction under Sections 120B, 364, 302 IPC with life imprisonment confirmed.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by Pramod Shahu, Mukesh Shivhare, and Rajkumar Wankhede against their conviction by the Sessions Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Under-Trial Accused in Murder Case Due to 9-Year Incarceration and HIV Condition. Long Incarceration Violates Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21; Bail Granted Under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

The applicant, Ganesh Madhukar Mendarkar, filed a regular bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302 and 323 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Nazimoddin Mohammaddin alias Nasiroddin, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 32...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...