Search Results for "father convicted"

3081 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3081 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Cruelty Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Huligappa, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Bagalkot, in S.C. No. 27/2011 for offences under Sections 498A and 302 IPC for the alle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not reliable, leading to benefit of doubt.

The appellant, Devanand Baburao Sanap, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, in Sessions Case No. 103 of 1999 for the murder of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Live-in Relationship Murder Case. Three accused convicted under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 IPC for murdering the husband of one accused due to illicit relationship.

The case pertains to the murder of Abel Pereira, who was in a live-in relationship with accused No.2 Baya Abel Pereira. Baya developed an illicit rela...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and lack of corroboration.

The appellants, Gulab, Sunil, Kamal, Amol, and Durgabai, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana in Sessions Case No.65/2017. Gulab a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 120B IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed against the judgment of the III Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Belagavi in S.C. No. 170/2016 dated 05.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 376/511 and 506 IPC and SC/ST Act – Appeal Filed Against Conviction Citing Delay in FIR and Inconsistent Evidence

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, by Hiralal Kasam Shaikh, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Six Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as sole reliance on interested witnesses and absence of independent corroboration rendered prosecution case doubtful.

The case pertains to the murder of one person during a sudden attack by a group of 50-60 persons. The appellants, six individuals, were convicted by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Conviction Set Aside Due to Gaps in Chain of Circumstances. Failure to Prove Motive and Last Seen Theory Beyond Reasonable Doubt Leads to Benefit of Doubt Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 302, 201, 120B.

The appellant, Vrishal Madhukar Kalane, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 201, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Dowry Death and Cruelty. Accused Husband and Mother-in-Law Challenge Life Imprisonment and Fine Imposed by Trial Court Under Sections 304B, 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal appeal filed by Accused No.1 (husband of the deceased) and Accused No.3 (mother-in-law) agai...