High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Hears Group of Writ Petitions by University Employees. No adjudicative details available in the provided text.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "equitable order"
2431 result(s) found
Found 2431 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Appeal for Injunction Against Demolition of Unauthorized Construction. Builder who constructed seven upper floors without permission and inducted flat purchasers without occupation certificate is not entitled to equitable relief of temporary injunction.
27 Apr 2005The appellant, M/s. Leela Enterprises, a partnership firm, filed an appeal against an order of the trial court refusing to grant a temporary injunctio...
- 164
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Tribunal Order Directing Displaced Officer to Resume Post Without Hearing Petitioner. Transfer Order Upheld as Petitioner Had Already Taken Charge, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.
26 Jun 2023The Petitioner, Shri Rajendra s/o Maruti Najan, was posted as Tahsildar (Revenue) in Collector Office, Nashik since 23 April 2020. By order dated 12 A...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Auction Purchasers' Petition in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Overriding Effect of Section 26E Over MVAT Act. Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction Held Free from Prior Sales Tax Attachment Under Section 38C of MVAT Act.
12 Jul 2023The petitioners, Shailesh K. Bothra and Mukesh C. Karwa, were auction purchasers of a property sold by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. (pe...
- 91
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.
5 Nov 2014The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...
- 144
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts Under Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the company was commercially insolvent and unable to pay its debts, and appointed the Official Liquidator to take charge of its assets.
18 Nov 2016The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) r...
- 94
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to MEH Category Seat Matrix by Linguistic Minority Medical College. The Court examined the consensual agreement dated 19.01.2022 and Section 4A of the Karnataka Professional Educational Institutions Act, 2006, to determine whether the State's categorization of seats as 'MEH Category' violated the petitioner's rights under Article 30(1) of the Constitution.
15 Mar 2022The writ petitions were filed by Navodaya Medical College, a Telugu linguistic minority institution, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Considers Habeas Corpus Petition for Repatriation of Child in Alleged International Abduction. The Court Examined Whether a Writ Under Article 226 Should Issue to Return the Minor to the USA Given the Pending Utah Custody Proceedings and the Mother's Alleged Violation of a Foreign Restraining Order.
7 May 2026The Bombay High Court at Goa considered a criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the husband, seeking a writ o...
- 34
High Court
COMMERCIAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2025
7 Aug 2026The appellant, a partnership firm, filed a commercial suit for recovery of its claim amount after attempting pre-institution mediation. The appellant ...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Confirmation of Share Transfer in Wound-Up Company Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Evidence. Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 requires timely application and proof of bona fide transfer before winding up order.
22 Feb 2012The appellant, Rathnam P.V., filed an appeal against the order of the Company Judge dismissing his application under Section 536(2) of the Companies A...
- 68
