WRIT PETITION NO. 5204 OF 2019
20 Nov 2019The present writ petition was filed by six petitioners, including two public limited companies and four individuals, challenging an order dated 30.05....
Search Results for "construction loan"
997 result(s) found
Found 997 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.
13 Nov 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...
- 919
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Injunction Against Bank Guarantee Encashment — Appellate Court's Order Set Aside for Failure to Establish Fraud or Special Equities. The court held that an injunction against bank guarantee can only be granted in exceptional circumstances of fraud or special equities, and the appellate court erred in granting such relief without proper findings.
23 Jun 2005The petitioner, Man Industries India Ltd., challenged the order of the 6th Adhoc Additional District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Appeal No.150 of 20...
- 94
High Court
High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award on Price Adjustment Claim. The Court held that the Commercial Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and interpreting contract clauses under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the arbitral award was based on material evidence and not patently illegal.
2 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a contract dated 09.07.2018 between the appellant, a contractor, and the respondent, the Deputy Commissioner of Dharwad Distric...
- 286
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Arbitration Dispute. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 37 by Remanding Matter to Arbitrator Despite Consent of Parties to Dispense with Cross-Examination.
3 Dec 2019The dispute arose out of a joint venture agreement dated 14.12.1996 between the appellants (joint owners of land) and the respondent (a construction c...
- 151
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order in Rent Control Case — Subletting and Default in Payment of Rent Established. The court upheld the appellate judgment reversing the trial court's dismissal of the landlord's eviction suit under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
4 Jan 2010The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The landlords (respondents) filed a suit for eviction agains...
- 73
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Plaint to Correct Mistake in Description of Plaintiff in Recovery Suit. Inadvertent Error in Naming Individual Instead of Company Held Curable Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC.
1 Mar 2019The appellant, Varun Pahwa, as Director of Siddharth Garments Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 25,00,000/- advanced as loan to the responde...
- 244
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Commercial Dispute Classification Case — Rejection of Plaint as Commercial Dispute Set Aside. Court holds that a suit for recovery of money based on a loan agreement for business purposes is a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
18 Jun 2025The petitioner, M/s. Viswas Textile Processors, a partnership firm, filed a suit for recovery of money against ICICI Bank and other respondents. The s...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Divorce Appeal on Ground of Desertion Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Wife's Refusal to Return After Medical Treatment Constitutes Desertion. The court held that the wife's conduct showed a clear intention to permanently sever the matrimonial relationship, reversing the Family Court's dismissal.
10 Jun 2005The appellant-husband and respondent-wife were married on 2nd June 1986 at Kolhapur. In 1993, the wife fell ill and despite treatment at Kolhapur, her...
- 143
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Execution Court Order Refusing to Attach Joint Family Property. UCO Bank's Suit Decreed Against Defendants Jointly and Severally, but Execution Court Held That Property of Non-Defendant Family Members Cannot Be Attached Without Proving That Loan Was for Family Necessity or Business Benefit Under Hindu Law.
17 Oct 2005The petitioner, UCO Bank, had filed a Special Civil Suit No.94 of 1990 against defendants, including Ramchandra Namdeo Shirke (defendant No.1) and his...
- 40
