Search Results for "confession statement"

964 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 964 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Extra-Judicial Confession and Circumstantial Evidence. Appellant's Voluntary Surrender and Blood-Stained Clothes Corroborate Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Pravin Khimji Chauhan, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Renu, and sentenced to life...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eye Witness Testimony and Doubtful Recovery of Weapon. Bitter Gourd Creeper Dispute Leads to Life Imprisonment Reversed as Court Finds Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Ashok Chindha Birhade, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his neighbour Devidas, arising from a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery in Auto Rickshaw Snatching Case — Identification by Informant and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 394 IPC.

The revision petitioner, Mansingh Dhonduram Sakpal, was convicted by the trial Magistrate for the offence punishable under Section 394 read with Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Extra-judicial confession made in police custody held inadmissible under Section 26 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, leading to acquittal under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Dharma Krishna Bhoye, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of one person and sentenced to life...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Property Dispute Case. Circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen together, and false explanation held sufficient to convict under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

The appellants, Savita Namdev Dethe (accused no.1) and Namdev Sadashiv Dethe (accused no.2), were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses NCB Appeal Against Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Independent Panch Witnesses and Procedural Irregularities. Heroin Recovery from Hotel Room Found Unreliable as Panch Witnesses Were Hotel Employees and Not Independent.

The appeal was filed by the Intelligence Officer of the Narcotic Control Bureau against the judgment and order of the Special Judge, Gr. Bombay dated ...