Search Results for "adjudication proceedings"

5780 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5780 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Reference of Minimum Wages Dispute to Industrial Tribunal. Settlement Barring Financial Demands Does Not Preclude Statutory Minimum Wages Claim Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Pix Transmissions Limited, an employer, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Central Excise Appeal in Purification Activity Case — Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Judicial Indiscipline. Purification of excise duty paid goods on job work basis does not amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Tribunal bound by precedents.

The Bombay High Court disposed of Central Excise Appeal No.179 of 2014 and Civil Writ Petition No.279 of 2015 by a common order. The appellant, Sunbel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Awards Reinstating Employees Terminated Without Inquiry. Termination Without Domestic Inquiry Held Illegal Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment involves a group of writ petitions filed by the employer, Maharashtra Krushi Udyog Vikas Mahamandal Ltd., challenging the awards of the L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Interim Order in Labour Dispute. Industrial Court Had Stayed Settlement and Directed Interim Wage Increase, Raising Questions on Unfair Labour Practices and Binding Nature of Settlements Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The matter arose from a challenge to an interim order passed by the Industrial Court on 31 July 2017 in a complaint of unfair labour practices under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Excise Dispute to High Court for Comprehensive Adjudication on Natural Justice and Statutory Validity Issues. High Court Erred in Limiting Decision to Vires of Section 9-D Without Applying Principles to Department's Actions Under Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

The appeals arose from a judgment and order dated 28th August 2009 by the Delhi High Court, which disposed of five writ petitions challenging actions ...