Search Results for "1922"

511 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 511 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Defamation Proceedings Against Newspaper Owners for Lack of Specific Allegations of Mens Rea. Petitioners, as Chairman and Managing Director, Not Shown to Have Direct Role in Publication of Alleged Defamatory Material.

The petitioners, B V Seetaram and Rohini Seetaram, were the Chairman and Managing Director respectively of Chitra Publications Pvt. Ltd., which publis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions in KVAT Act Case — Joint Commissioner Had Jurisdiction to Invoke Suo Moto Revision Under Section 63-A. Purchases from Composition Dealers Not Deductible from Contract Receipts for Taxable Turnover.

The case involves revision petitions filed by M/S JMC Projects (India) Ltd. against the State of Karnataka under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes MCI Order Striking Off Doctor's Name from Medical Register for One Year for Alleged Violation of Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 — Failure to Report Organ Retrieval from Deceased Donor Not a Ground for Erasure of Name.

The petitioner, Dr. Ramcharan Thiagarajan, a renowned surgical gastroenterologist and multi-organ transplant surgeon, was working as a consultant at F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows DNA Test in Partition Suit to Determine Paternity Under Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC. The court upheld the appellate court's order for DNA testing to establish the relationship between the parties in a partition suit.

The petitioner, Sri Hanumappa, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 13.1.2014 passed by the Senior Civil Judge at Hiriyur in R.A.No.11/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Union of India in Army Dismissal Case Due to Procedural Irregularity. Summary Court Martial Conducted Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Army Rules 22-24 and Section 80 of Army Act, 1950 Renders Dismissal Void.

The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, and other appellants challenged an order dated 5th September 2001 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Kar...