Search Results for "uniform statute"

571 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 571 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes CIC Order Holding Deemed University Not a 'Public Authority' Under RTI Act — Right to Information Act, 2005 Not Applicable to Deemed Universities Established Under UGC Act, 1956

The petitioner, Manipal University, a deemed university declared under Section 3 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956, challenged an order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking to Exclude MLAs/MPs from Voting in Mayor Election. Writ of mandamus refused as petitioners failed to show any legal bar preventing legislators from voting in municipal corporation mayoral elections.

The petitioners, who were corporators of the Corporation of the City of Belgaum, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Minimum Attendance Requirement for Law Students in Promotion Regulation. Regulation requiring 75% attendance for promotion from first to second year of 5-year B.A., LL.B. course held valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, students of Vidyodaya Law College, Tumkur, and others, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging Withdrawal of Labour Welfare Cess Exemption for SEZ Developers. The court held that the exemption was a concession and could be withdrawn by the government, and the appellant had no vested right to its continuation.

The appellant, M/s. Primal Projects Limited, a company engaged in constructing and developing IT parks in Special Economic Zones (SEZ), challenged the...