Search Results for "single transaction rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "single transaction rule"

1678 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1678 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MCGM Transfer Premium Demand in Property Lease Case — Unilateral Reopening of Concluded Transactions by Public Authority Not Permitted. Court holds that once a transfer premium was accepted without reservation, a second demand for the same transfer is barred by principles of finality and legitimate expectation under Article 226 of the Constitution.

24 Aug 2023

The Petitioner, Prabhat Sadan Properties Private Limited, owned a leasehold property in Byculla, Mumbai, under a lease from the Municipal Corporation ...

High Court

High Court Rejects Plaint in Money Recovery Suit - Applicant Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Succeeds -Plaintiff' Suit Barred by Maharashtra Money Lending Act Due to Unlicensed Lending

21 Jan 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard an interim application filed by the defendant under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against Admission of Insolvency Application Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Erstwhile Directors Cannot Maintain Appeal After Appointment of Insolvency Professional, Signaling Paradigm Shift to Inability of Management to Continue if Unable to Pay Debts.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The case arose under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), which came into force in November-December 2016. The ap...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against NCLT Order Admitting Insolvency Application Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Maharashtra Act Moratorium Does Not Bar Insolvency Proceedings as Section 238 of the Code Overrides Inconsistent State Laws.

1 Aug 2026

The appeal arose from the first application under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The corporate debtor, a multi-product compan...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Erstwhile Directors in First Insolvency Case, Holding IBC Overrides State Moratorium. Corporate Debtor's Belated Defence of Non-Disbursal Under Master Restructuring Agreement Rejected as After-Thought.

1 Aug 2026

The case arose from the first application under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant, a multi-product company, faced ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit — Holds That High Court Erred in Dismissing Suit on Grounds Not Raised in Pleadings and Without Considering Documentary Evidence. The Court restored the decree for recovery of Rs.96,41,765.31 with interest at 15% per annum from the date of suit till payment.

16 Dec 2021

The appellant, M/s Star Paper Mills Limited, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.96,41,765.31 against the respondents, M/s Beharilal Madanlal Jaipuria Ltd...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)