Search Results for "section 34"

604 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 604 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Lack of Reasons on Counterclaim and Limitation. Arbitrator Must Provide Sufficient Reasons When Rejecting Counterclaim on Limitation and Merits Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Arun T. Gujrathi, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds in Light of SEBI Circulars Extending Limitation Period from Six Months to Three Years. The court remitted the matter to the Arbitral Tribunal for reconsideration of limitation under the extended period.

The petitioner, India Infoline Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Dismissing Claims Under Section 25 of Arbitration Act for Lack of Notice. Arbitrator's Termination of Mandate Without Opportunity to Show Cause Held Patently Illegal and Against Public Policy.

The petitioner, Vishal Engineering Works, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Award in Stock Exchange Dispute. Claim Barred by Limitation Under NSE Bye-Laws as Last Transaction Occurred on 25th January 2008 and Six-Month Period Expired on 25th July 2008.

The petitioner, DBS Cholamandalam Securities Ltd, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Liquidated Damages and Risk Cost Recovery Set Aside. Termination of Contract Held Legal but Recovery of Liquidated Damages Without Proving Actual Loss and Risk Cost Expenses Without Proper Justification Set Aside.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL), a public se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator. Unilateral Appointment of Sole Arbitrator Contrary to Arbitration Clause Requiring Joint Nomination Invalidates Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Mrs. Sheeba Jose and Mr. Jose Paramban Ouseph, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chall...