Search Results for "revenue mutation"

992 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 992 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Deputy Commissioner Cannot Exceed Revisional Jurisdiction Under Karnataka Municipalities Act – Karnataka High Court Quashes Building Licence and Khata Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice"

The petitioner challenged the orders dated 27.11.2013 and 02.08.2017 whereby the building licence granted in respect of the subject property was cance...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Against Tribunal Order Dismissing Land Revenue Appeal as Not Maintainable. Mutation Dispute Under Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 - Second Appeal Held Maintainable Despite Absence of Specific Provision.

The petitioners, four individuals, challenged the order of the Land Revenue Tribunal dated 19/1/2022, which dismissed their Land Revenue Appeal No.48/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Dispute — Petitioners Failed to Exhaust Alternative Remedy Under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, ten individuals from Shendur, Kagal, Kolhapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner’s Order Cancelling Land Grant for Violation of Natural Justice. Cancellation Order Passed Without Notice or Hearing Violated Principle of Audi Alteram Partem, Necessitating Remand for Fresh Adjudication.

The case concerned a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a religious charitable trust challenging an order of the De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Appellant failed to prove title and possession; courts below rightly dismissed suit for declaration and injunction.

The appellant, Sri G.K. Shekharappa, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Public Servants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals against a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Kashinath Vikramji Thorat (accused No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Trust Property Encroachment Case — Defendant Acquitted of Adverse Possession Claim. Suit for Possession by Trust Held Not Barred by Limitation as Encroachment is Continuing Wrong Under Section 23 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Namdeo Khedkar (appellant/defendant) against the judgment of the Joint District Judge, Chandrapur, which re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Compensation — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Entitlement to Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Claimants Failed to Establish Title or Possession Over Acquired Land, and Their Challenge Was Barred by Delay and Laches.

The petitioners, Bansrajidevi and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 12/6/1986 p...