Search Results for "purpose test"

6144 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6144 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Caste Claim of 'Mana' Scheduled Tribe Student. Affidavit of Tribal Elders and Consistent School Records Held Sufficient to Establish Caste Validity Under Maharashtra Act No. XXIII of 2001.

The petitioner, Ku. Seema Mukunda Nannaware, a student pursuing MBBS at Indira Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, challenged the order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Rape and Murder of Four-Year-Old Girl. Conviction under Sections 302, 376(2)(i), 377, 363, 366, 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code Upheld for Acts Committed in Furtherance of Common Intention.

The case arises from a reference under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for confirmation of the death sentence and an appeal agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The Court Examines Whether the Trial Court Erred in Convicting the Accused on Inconsistent Motive Evidence and Weak Circumstantial Links.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the accused, aged 24 years, under Section 302 IPC and sentence of life imprisonment and fine by the trial cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal of Accused Convicted Under Section 302 IPC Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Set Aside as Motive, Last Seen, Recovery Evidence and Dog Tracking Held Unreliable, Failing to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances Pointing to Guilt.

This appeal arose from the conviction of the accused, a 24-year-old villager, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Consumer Protection Appointment Rules; Selection Committee Procedure Under Scrutiny. Court Considers Whether Rules Violate Article 14 and Supreme Court Directions in State of UP v. UP Consumer Protection Bar Association.

These two petitions challenged the Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Arms Act Case Due to Lack of Essential Ingredient in DAD Notification. Possession of Buttondar Knife Not an Offence Unless for Manufacture, Sale or Test Under Delhi Administration Notification.

The appellant, Irfan Khan, was charged under Sections 25, 54, and 59 of the Arms Act, 1959, based on FIR No. 477/2022 registered at Police Station Gov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Criminal Appeal Challenging Conviction Under NDPS Act for Possession of Mandrax Tablets Upholding Admissibility of Chemical Analyser's Report Under S.293 CrPC. Non-examination of Chemical Analyst Not Fatal Owing to S.36-C NDPS Act Incorporating CrPC Provisions.

The appellant was convicted by the Special Court under NDPS Act for possession of mandrax tablets (methaqualone), totaling 103 kg, found on two occasi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Weapon Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 307, 201, 342 IPC.

The appellant, Ibarat Husain Kitabullah, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, in Sessions Case No. 16 of 2007 for offences under Sec...