Search Results for "oral evidence exclusion"

780 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 780 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court's Finding of Perverse Enquiry Findings. Evidence in Domestic Enquiry Must Be Sworn on Oath Before Competent Authority; Unsworn Written Statement Renders Findings Perverse Under Section 28 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s Siddheshwar Urban Coop. Bank Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging the Part I orders of the Labour Court at Aurangabad. The r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 12.4.2005 passed by the First Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over 'AB' Wall — Remand Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction. First Appellate Court Exceeded Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC by Remanding Without Recording Satisfaction That Decree Was Reversed or Set Aside.

The present miscellaneous second appeal was filed by the appellants/defendants challenging the judgment and decree dated 31.01.2013 passed by the Fast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Dismisses Chamber Summons Filed to Introduce Additional Evidence in Appeal Related to Specific Performance" "Court emphasizes the discretionary nature of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC and deters misuse aimed at prolonging litigation."

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Chamber Summons filed under Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) of the CPC by the Appellants seeking to produce additional evide...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Addresses Challenge to Arbitral Award Granting Damages in Electricity Supply Contract Dispute. Tribunal's Award of Damages for Installed Objects Questioned on Grounds of Fundamental Breach Limited to Uninstalled Units Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) and it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Railway Platform Inspector Convicted for Bribery Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Conviction Upheld Despite Defective Sanction from Incompetent Authority, Quashing of First Proceedings No Bar to Retrial, Irregularity in Recording Evidence Cured Under S. 537 CrPC.

The case concerned a platform inspector employed by the North Eastern Railway who was prosecuted for accepting a bribe of Rs. 15 and a bottle of liquo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Partition and Declaration. Daughter Challenges Will Dated 15.06.2001 Alleging Suspicious Circumstances and Non-Compliance with Proof Requirements Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1956.

The Regular First Appeal arose from a suit for declaration, partition, and mesne profits filed by one of the daughters of late M. Krishnappa. The dece...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence in Gangrape Case: First Conviction Under Section 376E IPC After 2013 Amendment. Trial Court Imposed Capital Punishment for Repeat Offenders in the Shakti Mill Incident, and the High Court Reviewed Procedural Propriety of the Sentence.

The judgment under analysis is a confirmation case arising from the brutal gangrape of a young photo journalist at Shakti Mill premises in Mumbai on 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Mark Documents in Suit for Permanent Injunction. Trial Court's Order Set Aside for Failure to Consider Admissibility Under Evidence Act and CPC.

The petitioners, defendants 3 and 4 in a suit for permanent injunction (O.S.No.7485/2011) filed by the plaintiffs, challenged an order dated 13.6.2013...