Search Results for "forged agreement"

536 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 536 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Country Liquor Manufacturer Against Inclusion of State Excise Duty in Sale Price for Sales Tax. State Excise Duty paid directly by purchaser is not part of sale price under Section 2(28) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited (a cooperative society) and its office bearer, are manufacturers of country liquor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Possession Recovery in Trespass Suit Against Unauthorized Occupant of Tenanted Premises. Statutory Tenancy Cannot Be Bequeathed by Will; Only Heirs Entitled Under Section 5(11)(c) of Bombay Rent Act.

The plaintiff, Shaikh Jaber Abdulah J AI Sabah, owner of the suit building AlJabriya Court at Marine Drive, Mumbai, filed a suit for recovery of posse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 7 Application for CIRP — Claimants Failed to Prove Debt and Default. The Tribunal held that the Appellants did not establish the existence of a financial debt or default, and the application was barred by limitation.

The present appeal was filed by Vistra ITCL (India) Limited, Pratiti Trading Private Limited, and Gajendra Investment Limited (Appellants) against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Title — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds that a co-owner can sue for possession without impleading other co-owners and that adverse possession cannot be claimed against a co-owner.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and first appellate court in a su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal in Property Dispute; Focuses on Compliance of Order 32 CPC and Effect of Abatement on Deceased Defendant

The appeal was filed against the judgment and decree dated 08.11.2013 passed by the XXVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, in O.S.No.16723/200...