Search Results for "eligibility scrutiny"

543 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 543 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State and Employee in Service Rule Relaxation Dispute. High Court's Quashing of Government Order Granting Promotion Set Aside as Relaxation Was Validly Granted.

The Supreme Court heard two sets of appeals arising from a judgment of the Madras High Court in Writ Appeal No. 996 of 2015 and an order dismissing Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Pharmaceutical Distributor for Violation of Natural Justice. Blacklisting Without Show Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Invalid Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. Sujal Pharma, a proprietorship firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged a blacklisting order dated 29.10.2021 issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award in Smart City Project — No Material Irregularity Found in Evaluation Process. The court held that the deviations in the commercial bid were not material and the tender committee's decision was reasonable.

The petitioner, NEC Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., challenged the decision of Shivamogga Smart City Limited (respondent No.1) to award a tender to Bhar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes CAT Interim Order in Service Matter — Deputation Absorption Dispute. CAT lacked jurisdiction to restrain State Government from absorbing deputationists into Karnataka Administrative Service, and order passed without hearing affected parties violates natural justice.

The petitioners, eight officers of the Karnataka State Government, were on deputation to various departments and were sought to be absorbed into the K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Probationary District Judge for Unsatisfactory Performance. Termination under Rule 13(4)(ii)(b) of Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 is valid and not stigmatic.

The petitioner, Smt. Smita Rajendra Kadu, was appointed as a District Judge (direct recruitment) under the Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008. S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Selection of Junior Accounts Officer in Zilla Parishad — No Violation of Recruitment Rules Found. Preference given to candidate with post-graduation in Commerce with Accounting and Auditing as per advertisement conditions.

The petitioner, Nilkanth Ashok Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the selection of Respondent No.4, Sudhir Nivruti Jadhvar, for the post of Juni...