Search Results for "double benefit"

602 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 602 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules on Stamp Duty Penalty: A Critical Examination of Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Seetharama Shetty vs. Monappa Shetty, addressed the legal implications of Sections 33, 34, 37, and 39 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Despite Delay in Filing Application Under Section 48(1) of Maharashtra Stamp Act. Limitation Bars Remedy Not Right, State Cannot Retain Double Stamp Duty on Same Transaction.

The petitioner, Nanji Dana Patel, entered into a development agreement with Keshav Krishanlal Syngal on 3 March 2014, paying stamp duty of Rs.78,65,00...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Ex-Chief Minister and MLA in Prison Assault Case Due to Bar Under Prisons Act, 1894. Alleged Offences Committed Inside Notified Temporary Prison Must Be Dealt With Under Special Statute, Not General Criminal Law.

The Bombay High Court allowed two applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by accused No. 1 (an ex-Chief Minister)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Contradictory Evidence and Failure to Rebut Presumption. Appellant failed to prove legally enforceable debt as cheque was issued as security and loan transaction not reflected in income tax returns.

The appellant, Sri Dattatraya, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) against the respondent, Sharanappa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Applications for Appointment of Arbitrator in Pending Suits Under Section 8 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies only before filing of first statement on substance of dispute, not to pending suits.

The petitioner, HMT Watches Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders passed by the Pr...