Search Results for "conciliation under CPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "conciliation under CPC"

518 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 518 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Place Additional Documents in Arbitration Proceedings — Petitioner's Application Under Rule 4(b) of the High Court of Karnataka Arbitration Rules, 2001 Read with Section 151 CPC Wrongly Dismissed as Not Maintainable.

21 Nov 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Karnataka State Electronics Development Corporation Limited, a Government of Karnataka undertaking, filed a writ petition under A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Consent Order Recording Settlement in Arbitration Challenge. Parties Bound by Compromise Under Order XXIII Rules 1 & 3 CPC; No Appeal Lies Against Consent Order.

5 Mar 2021

The appellant, Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation, entered into a contract with the respondent, M/s. Antony Waste Handling Cell Pvt. Ltd., f...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Maintenance Case — Family Court Erred in Rejecting Petition on Territorial Jurisdiction Grounds Without Proper Inquiry. Wife's Affidavit of Residence Sufficient to Establish Jurisdiction Under Section 126 Cr.P.C.

7 Jul 2022

The petitioners, Sangeeta W/o Bapu Lamani and her three minor children, filed a petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Seeking Direction to Establish Family Court in Goa due to Lack of Mandatory Obligation and Insufficient Caseload. Court Holds Section 3(1)(a) of Family Courts Act, 1984 Inapplicable as No Town in Goa Exceeds One Million Population, and Discretionary Power under Section 3(1)(b) Not Compellable.

7 Apr 2016

The petitioner, P Giridhar, through his power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Extension of Time for Filing Written Statement Beyond 120 Days Under Amended CPC. Mandatory Forfeiture of Right to File Written Statement After Expiry of Statutory Period Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC as Amended by Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

1 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against two orders of the High Court that permitted the defendant to file a written statement beyond the statutory...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case — Directs Arbitral Tribunal to Reconsider Interim Deposit Order in Light of Force Majeure Clause. Court holds that while passing interim measures under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Arbitral Tribunal must consider the force majeure clause and the bonafide dispute raised by the lessee, and cannot direct deposit of 100% rental amount without prima facie evaluating the applicability of such clause.

28 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from two lease agreements between Evergreen Land Mark Pvt. Ltd. (appellant-lessee) and John Tinson & Company Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Mortgage Dispute — Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Upheld Despite Lack of Pre-Appointment Notice. The court held that a claim for enforcement of a mortgage is arbitrable as it is in personam, and Section 21 of the Arbitration Act does not require notice before appointment when the agreement provides for unilateral appointment.

25 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and no exceptional grounds were made out for interference under Article 226.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, acting as a trust, filed two writ petitions under Art...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Prior Suit Filed in Wrong Court — Filing of Suit in Court Without Jurisdiction Does Not Bar Subsequent Arbitration Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

8 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Candid Drug Distributors, filed a suit in the competent court in Guwahati against the respondent, Wanbury Limited. The respondent chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Supply Dispute — Upholds Award on Unpaid Invoices but Sets Aside Interest Rate. Arbitrator's findings on oral contracts and quantum of supplies upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The petitioner, Royal Palms (India) Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)