Search Results for "commercial arbitration petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "commercial arbitration petition"

1252 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1252 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Section 9 Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration — Implied Party Finding Set Aside. Part I of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to pre-BALCO agreements, but non-signatory cannot be treated as implied party without express consent.

11 Jan 2013

The petitioners, GL Asia Mauritius II Cayman Limited and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21/08/2010 passed by the District Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application to Appoint Arbitrator in BPCL Contract Dispute — Unilateral Appointment Clause Invalid Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act. The court held that an arbitration clause giving one party the sole right to appoint an arbitrator is invalid under Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed an independent arbitrator.

26 May 2017

The applicant, DBM Geotechnics & Constructions Pvt Ltd (DBM), filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Invoices Under Dealership Agreement. The court found that the arbitration clause in the Dealership Agreement dated 19/06/2013 was valid and disputes existed, warranting appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Kirloskar Pneumatic Company Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Review Petition with 1495 Days Delay in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay.

22 Aug 2019

The present review petition was filed by Electronics & Controls Power Systems Private Limited under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Charter Party Dispute — Award Upheld as Not Contrary to Public Policy. Court Refuses to Interfere with Arbitrator's Findings on Demurrage and Hire Charges Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 Jun 2011

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute Over Coal Handling Services. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that allegations of fraud were not serious enough to render dispute non-arbitrable and rejects challenge to award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Nov 2023

The case involves a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Maharashtra Power Generation Company Ltd. (Petitioner) seeking to set aside an arbitral a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Commercial Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Appeal Questions the Upholding of Arbitral Award Granting Remuneration and Indemnity Under Reconstitution Deed of Partnership Firm.

30 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Arbitration Petitions in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Holds That Non-Signatories Can Be Referred to Arbitration Under Group of Companies Doctrine. The court applied the group of companies doctrine to refer non-signatory appellants to arbitration, finding that they were closely connected to the signatory broker and the transactions were indivisible.

7 Apr 2021

The case involves four appeals filed by members of the Madgavkar family (Anil V. Madgavkar, Celsa A. Madgavkar, Ayesha A. Madgavkar, and Aakash A. Mad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Referral to Arbitration in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement of Sale Contains Valid Arbitration Clause. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates referral when arbitration agreement exists and subject matter is arbitrable.

20 Mar 2018

The Petitioner, Suman Baburao Thapa, was the defendant in Special Civil Suit No.566 of 2011 filed by Respondent Nos.1 and 2 (Jigar K. Mehta and Anand ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages, rejecting grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

14 Mar 2013

The petitioners, Pradyuman Kumar Sharma and Kuber Planters Limited, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)