Search Results for "civil suit stay"

2790 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2790 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Letters Patent Appeal against decree for possession and mesne profits dismissed as no substantial question of law or perversity found in concurrent findings of fact.

The present Letters Patent Appeal arises from a judgment and decree passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No. 133/1976, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Civil Application for Lack of Error Apparent on Record. Court holds that review is not an appeal in disguise and that the judgment under review did not suffer from any error apparent on the face of the record.

The applicants, who were the original respondents in the main petition, filed a review application under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Combined Second Appeals in Property Dispute Involving Individual and Charity. Substantial Questions of Law Frame the Priority of Gift Deed Over Sale Deed and Effect of Pending Litigation.

The judgment pertains to two second appeals preferred before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, arising out of two civil suits ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell by Minor's Guardian Without Court Permission Under Section 8 of Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.

The appellant, Kasturbai Himmat Patil, filed a suit for specific performance of contract against the original defendant Lilabai Patil, alleging that L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale in Favor of Flat Purchaser Against Developer and Subsequent Purchasers. Agreement for Sale dated 6th March 1980 declared valid and binding, subsequent agreement dated 4th April 1988 declared bogus and invalid.

The case involves a dispute over the specific performance of an agreement for sale of a flat. The flat purchaser, Dr. Arun Subrao Prabhu, entered into...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Civil Revision Petition Against Trial Court's Failure to Consider Interim Injunction in SARFAESI Act Matter — Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The petitioners, Dr. Jaishith Jebakumar Manuel and Pon Manju Usha, filed a suit (O.S.No.118 of 2025) before the Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, ...