Search Results for "cadre and recruitment rules"

643 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 643 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Petition Challenging KSAT Order Quashing Recovery of Pay Fixation Benefits from Commercial Tax Officers. Recovery of excess pay without fault of employee held impermissible under Karnataka Civil Services Rules.

The State of Karnataka and the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Karnataka State Administrative Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal's Compensation Award for Illegal Termination of Teachers Under MEPS Act. Termination Without Prior Approval of Education Officer Held Illegal, but Back Wages Limited to One Year's Salary as Reinstatement Not Feasible Due to Superannuation.

The judgment involves four writ petitions arising from a dispute between two retired teachers, Baburao Dahat and Sulbha Hejib, and their employer, Jaw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Selection Process for Assistant Engineer Post in Tata Institute of Social Sciences. Substitution of Skill Test with Interview Violated Advertised Procedure, Court Quashes Selection and Orders Fresh Process.

The petitioner, Rahul Annasaheb Shende, a Civil Engineer with B.Tech qualification, was initially appointed as an Engineer on a contractual basis by T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Court Officers Seeking Parity in Pension and Retirement Benefits with Higher Judicial Officers. Classification of employees into Class I and Class II based on duties and responsibilities is valid and not discriminatory under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, fifteen officers of the High Court of Bombay holding positions such as Registrar, Prothonotary, Commissioner for Taking Accounts, Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Transfer of Designated Officers Under Food Safety Act — Administrative Transfer Not a Punishment Without Stigma. Transfer Order Issued in Public Interest and Administrative Convenience Does Not Require Prior Hearing Under Article 311(2) of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, eleven Designated Officers under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, challenged their transfer orders dated 15.12.2014 before th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Meritorious Candidate in Favor of Preferential Age Candidate for Backlog ST Post. The 2001 Rules' Age Preference Overrides Merit When Advertised as Mode of Selection Under Karnataka Reservation Act, 1990.

The case involves a service dispute between two Scheduled Tribe candidates for a single post of Assistant Professor in English at Bangalore University...