Search Results for "appellate interference"

7803 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7803 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision Against Eviction Decree for Landlord's Bonafide Need Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Concurrent findings on bonafide need and hardship not interfered with under Section 115 CPC as they were not perverse.

The petitioners, original defendants/tenants, challenged the concurrent eviction decrees passed by the trial court and the first appellate court under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Latur, dismissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Execution Proceedings - Limited Inquiry Under Order 21 Rule 101 CPC. Executing Court Not Required to Conduct Full-Fledged Trial When Obstruction is Ex Facie Baseless; Summary Rejection Permissible.

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of inquiry to be conducted by an Executing Court under Order 21 Rule 101 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 190...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Execution Court's Power to Extend Time for Deposit in Specific Performance Decree Despite Delay. Section 28 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 vests jurisdiction in the court executing the decree to extend time and reject rescission where decree-holder was ready and willing.

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 18.05.2005. The trial court decreed the suit in part, directing ref...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Assault and Criminal Intimidation but Grants Probation to Accused. Court holds that benefit of Probation of Offenders Act can be granted even after conviction if no previous conviction is proved and circumstances warrant leniency.

The case arises from a private complaint filed by Sushil Sawant (appellant) against six accused persons (respondents 2 to 7) alleging offences under S...