Search Results for "Tea"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Tea"

908 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 908 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Alleged Excess Pay from Leave Encashment – Section 33-C(1) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Recovery of excess payment after five years held iniquitous and arbitrary, following Chandi Prasad Uniyal principle.

19 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Vilas Pandurang Markande, a former employee of the Mumbai Port Trust (respondent No.2), filed a Writ Petition challenging the order da...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Ejectment Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Production of Mortgage Deed. Defendant's Application for Production of Mortgage Deed Under Order 8 Rule 1-A CPC Allowed as Document Was Relevant and Not Previously Available.

5 Apr 2017

The plaintiff filed a suit for ejectment against the defendant seeking possession of the plaint schedule premises. The suit was at the stage of trial....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute Regarding Canteen Workers' Status as Workmen of Principal Employer. Canteen workers employed through contractor held to be workmen of BEML Limited under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 due to statutory obligation to provide canteen.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals filed by BEML Limited (formerly Bharat Earth Movers Ltd.) and the President of Mysore Division General Labour Associatio...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows BEML's Appeal in Canteen Workers' Regularisation Dispute — Contract Labour Not Absorbed Despite Canteen Being Statutory Obligation. The court held that the workmen in a statutory canteen run by a contractor are not entitled to regularisation as employees of the principal employer under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order dated 16.04.2010 in Writ Petition No. 35453/2003. The appellant in WA No. 1980/2010 is BEML ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows BEML's Appeal in Canteen Workers' Regularisation Dispute — Contract Labour Not Absorbed Despite Canteen Being Statutory Obligation. The court held that without a notification under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, contract labour cannot be deemed employees of the principal employer, and the Labour Court exceeded its jurisdiction by directing absorption.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order dated 16.04.2010 passed by a Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court in Writ Petition No. 3...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 302, and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

8 Sep 2015

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Purushotham and Manjunatha (appellants) against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rai...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 read with 149 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

17 Nov 2015

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction and sentence by the II Additional District and Sessions Jud...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MCOCA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Acquittal in Predicate Offence Renders Subjective Satisfaction Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority must consider all relevant material, including acquittal in the predicate offence, before forming subjective satisfaction under MCOCA.

20 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Suraj @ Nagesh Shivaji Mahanoor, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Circuit Bench at Kolhapur) seeking to quash and s...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)