Search Results for "Spot Panchnama"

1672 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1672 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Last Seen Evidence Unreliable and Extra-Judicial Confession Not Voluntary.

The appellant, Nitesh Pundlikrao Kathe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati for the murder of his wife under Section 302 IPC and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Not Complete to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 392 read with Section 34 of IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Sawantwadi dated 24 January 1997 acquitting the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.678 OF 2014

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances.

The appellant, Ashok Dhondiram Dhavale, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibag for the murder of Leelabai and her daughter Manisha under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole reliance on extra-judicial confession without independent corroboration found unsafe.

The appellant, Arjun Ishwara Gejage, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Satara, for the murder of a person on 18th February 2014. The prosecution ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 326 IPC for Causing Grievous Hurt by Setting Victim on Fire. The court found that the dying declaration was reliable and the act constituted grievous hurt, but not murder, as the intention to cause death was not proved.

The appellant, Prakash Sadu Raut, was convicted under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for causing grievous hurt to Ranjana (also known as S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping, Murder, and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Child Murder Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Motive Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 364, 302, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Barku Bhavrao Bhaskar, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No.49 of 2001 for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 1007 of 2018; Appeal Against Conviction by Sessions Court. Appeal challenges conviction dated December 10, 2009 in Sessions Case No. 778 of 2008.

This matter pertains to a criminal appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, instituted by the appellant, Eknath Krishna Kadam, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Last Seen Theory and Motive Established. Nephew convicted for murder of 12-year-old cousin under Section 302 IPC, sentenced to life imprisonment.

The appellant, Noor Ahmed Mohammed Bagwan, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his 12-year-old cousin Aman. The prosecution case was...