Search Results for "Section 105 CPC"

419 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 419 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate to Deceased Wife's Will in Testamentary Suit Filed by Husband. Sons' Allegations of Forgery, Undue Influence, and Mutual Will Irrevocability Fail; Court Holds Due Execution Proved Under Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The plaintiff, husband of the deceased Vilasgauri Manilal Doshi, filed a testamentary suit seeking probate of his wife’s will dated 15 April 1970. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.

The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Videocon Industries Against Winding Up Order for Non-Payment of Guarantee Debt to Italian Bank. Patronage Letter Held to Be a Guarantee Under Indian Contract Act, 1872, and Claim Not Time-Barred.

The case involves an appeal by Videocon Industries Limited against an order of the Company Judge directing payment of Rs.259.73 crores to Intesa Sanpa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Division Bench of Bombay High Court Hears Appeals from Single Judge Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit. Ex-Parte Decree Passed in Diamond Supply Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC After Defendants Failed to Comply with Conditional Deposit Order.

The dispute arose from a summary suit filed by Sailam BVBA, a Belgian partnership firm, against Helios Jewellery Pvt Ltd (Defendant No.1) and its four...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Summary Suit for Recovery of Balance Consideration Under Agreement for Sale. Court holds that leave to defend cannot be granted on the basis of vague and unsubstantiated allegations of payment in cash, and that the defendant failed to raise a triable issue.

The appellant-defendant, Vikram Trimbak Pawar, entered into an Agreement for Sale dated 23 November 2016 with the respondent-plaintiff, Technocrat Con...