Search Results for "Recovery Panchanama"

1681 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1681 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Love Marriage Dispute — Brother-in-Law Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Stabbing Deceased. Evidence of Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Nilesh @ Nitin Kanhere, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-6, Nagpur, for the murder of Deepak Charpe, his brother-in-law, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 342 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by medical or circumstantial evidence.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 302 and 342 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellants, Nijamuddin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a village rivalry between two factions that led to the death of one person. The prosecution arrested 18 persons from the rival gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unnatural Conduct of Witnesses. Conviction for murder of wife based on circumstantial evidence set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Netaji Shivram Chougale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadhinglaj, for the murder of his wife Manisha on 18th Novembe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramesh Namdeo Naikwade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Niphad for the murder of Dagu under Section 302 of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Suresh Vithoba Gangode, was convicted by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for the murder of his wife Shali under Section 302 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 460, 392, 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Roshan Anant Sawant, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg-Oros, for the murder of Alakamai Atmaram Sawant, an elderly woman ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction Based on Section 106 of Evidence Act Set Aside as Prosecution Did Not Establish Foundational Facts.

The appellant, Raosaheb Kakade, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Chhayabai, by the Additional Sess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused in Market Committee Secretary Murder Case — Acquits Two Others on Benefit of Doubt. Conspiracy and motive established through evidence of prior enmity and recovery of weapons.

The case pertains to the murder of the secretary of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) at Navi Mumbai. The prosecution alleged that the ...