Search Results for "Land encroachment"

866 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 866 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encroachment on Common Pathway, Holds Dispute Over Patta Land Must Be Resolved by Civil Court. The court found that the pathway was patta land and a civil suit was pending, making the writ petition not maintainable.

The petitioner, D. Arputham, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Classification Change Due to Alternative Remedy. Petitioner's claim for restoration of 'Eri Ulvaai' classification and cancellation of patta held not maintainable under Article 226 as disputed questions of fact require civil suit.

The petitioner, R. Sarada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Eviction of Encroachers from Water Body Due to Lack of Evidence. Petitioner Failed to Produce Revenue Records or Survey Report, Court Held That Disputed Questions of Fact Cannot Be Adjudicated Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Lion.G.Devarajan, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the government respondents to consider his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Lock and Seal Notice in Unauthorised Construction Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 56(2A) of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. Notice Must Specify Time for Compliance Before Locking and Sealing; Failure to Do So Renders Notice Invalid.

The petitioner, R. Ashokan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 24.10.2025 issued by the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Interlocutory Order in Sarpanch Disqualification Case — No Power to Order Further Enquiry Under Section 16 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Collector's order for detailed inspection and cross-examination of Gram Sevak set aside as beyond statutory authority.

The petitioner, Dr. Vivek Vishwanath Mane, Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Malegaon, challenged an order dated 6-4-2013 passed by the Additional Collector,...