Search Results for "ITAT order"

531 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 531 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Compliance with BIFR Rehabilitation Scheme and Waiver of Pre-Deposit in Customs Dispute. BIFR Scheme Binding on Government Departments; Pre-Deposit Condition Quashed for Sick Industrial Company Under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The petitioner, SMS Lifesciences India Limited, filed two writ petitions. The first sought a mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 (Director General o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Gift of Property by Company to Director's Husband Held Not to be Income, as Assessee's Objections Were Not Properly Considered.

The petitioner, Bakhtawar Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., a closely held company, challenged a notice dated 30 March 2013 issued under Section 148 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Part, Remands for Fresh Consideration of Exemption Under Section 10(23C)(iiiab) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Not Considering Whether Assessee is Wholly or Substantially Financed by Government.

The case involves three appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging two orders of the Income Tax Appellat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case for Acer India Pvt. Ltd. — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Tribunal's deletion of TP adjustment upheld as consistent with earlier assessment year order.

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 29.11....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 1990-91. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion Without Fresh Material is Invalid and Section 45(4) Does Not Apply to Distribution of Assets on Retirement of Partner.

The petitioner, a partnership firm, challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 21st July 2003 seeking to reopen the asses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Stay on Tax Recovery in Gift of Shares Case Under Section 56(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court allows stay of recovery pending appeal, subject to conditions protecting revenue, without deciding merits of taxability of gift of shares.

The petitioner, M/s. Nerka Chemicals Private Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Demuric Holdings Private Limited (DHPL), challenged an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds Disallowance of Capital Losses and Business Loss on Guarantee Transactions. Tribunal's findings on sham transactions and lack of commercial substance affirmed under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Killick Nixon Limited, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal for Full Deduction of Roof Repair Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Expenditure incurred by tenant on replacement of common roof held to be revenue expenditure allowable in entirety as commercial expediency.

The appellant, Danesh A. Irani, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (IT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Withholding Tax on Firm Function Services Paid to Non-Resident US Company. Payments for Central Administrative Support Services Held Not Taxable as Fees for Included Services Under Indo-US Tax Treaty.

The petitioner, McKinsey & Company, Inc. (United States), a non-resident company incorporated under US laws, is part of the McKinsey Group providing i...