Search Results for "Aurangabad bench"

6505 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6505 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order to Try Jurisdiction as Preliminary Issue in Contract Dispute. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in contract designating Mumbai courts does not automatically oust territorial jurisdiction of Aurangabad court without proper adjudication.

The petitioner, M/s Ghai Construction, filed a suit (Spl. C. S. No. 276 of 2009) in the Civil Court at Aurangabad for recovery of Rs. 652.06 Lakhs fro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Court held that the prosecution failed to prove the offence of kidnapping for ransom under Section 364-A IPC beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of five respondents (original accused) for offences under Sections 363 and 364-A read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Public View. Alleged Caste-Based Insult Occurred Inside Private House, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellants, Pravin Machindra Neel and Vishal Machindra Neel, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Declares Arrest and Handcuffing Illegal, Grants Compensation for Police Misconduct. Petitioners were illegally detained and assaulted by police officers, leading to directions for registration of crime against erring officers and compensation of Rs. 2,00,000.

The petitioners, Kisan Rupa Pawar and his son Amol Kisan Pawar, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Disabled Employee in Service Dispute Against Trust and Welfare Authorities — Appointment of Person with Disability Upheld Under Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Third Party Lacks Locus Standi to Challenge Appointment of Disabled Person Under Section 33 of the Act.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from writ petitions concerning the appointment of Smt. Vaishali Walmik Bagul, a person with 50% d...