Search Results for "1964 Rules"

1669 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1669 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Scientific Officer for Unauthorised Absence and Misconduct — Petitioner Failed to Justify Absence Despite Repeated Opportunities. The court held that the termination was proportionate and that the principles of natural justice were complied with.

The petitioner, Mr. Sahivanagouda H. Patil, was a Scientific Officer at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) who had developed high-yielding groundnut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Setting Aside of Sarpanch Election Due to Procedural Violation. Election by show of hands after demand for secret ballot under Rule 10 of Bombay Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Upsarpanch) Election Rules, 1964 is void.

The petitioner, Sau. Kalpana w/o Laxman Bhujbal, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Mategaon on 29.8.2010. During the meeting, after a majority...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Petition Challenging KAT Order in Land Regularization Case. Court upholds regularization of unauthorized occupation under Section 94 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, finding no error in Tribunal's order.

The State of Karnataka, along with the Deputy Commissioner and Tahsildar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Quashing Petition in Alleged Fraudulent Land Grant by Bagair Hukum Saguvali Samithi. Petitioners Allege Complaint is Vague and Lacks Specifics, Claiming Sanction under Section 197 CrPC Required.

The case arose from a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash an FIR registered by Belur P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding-Up Order in Bond Default Case; Upholds Adverse Remarks Against Directors for Fund Diversion. Company Found Unable to Pay Debts and Substratum Lost, Justifying Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) of Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from a winding-up order passed by the learned company Judge against Zenith Infotech Limited (the appellant) in a petition filed by Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Termination of Traffic Manager Without Domestic Inquiry and Failure to Prove Abandonment Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, M/s. Universal Transport Co., challenged the orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which held that they had committed an un...