Search Results for "writ petition premature"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "writ petition premature"

981 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 981 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Execution Dispute — Quashes Order Dismissing Execution Petition as Not Maintainable. Withdrawal of Earlier Execution Petition Without Liberty Does Not Bar Fresh Execution Under Order XXI Rule 2 CPC.

12 Aug 2020

The writ petition was filed by the judgment-debtors (petitioners) challenging an order dated 19.04.2017 passed by the LII Additional City Civil and Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Challenge to Execution of Arbitral Award on Ground of Non-Receipt of Signed Copy Under Section 31(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Receipt of Certified Copy by Post Satisfies Section 31(5) and Award Becomes Enforceable Under Section 36(1).

10 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Rahul S/o Omprakash Gandhi, filed four writ petitions (W.P. Nos. 6091/2022, 6092/2022, 6093/2022, and 6094/2022) challenging the execu...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Husband's and Wife's Cross-Writ Petitions, Quashing Principal District Judge's Order That Exceeded Inherent Jurisdiction by Reviewing Withdrawal of Appeal. Withdrawal of Appeal Does Not Amount to Withdrawal of Original Petition Decided on Merits, and Res Judicata in Matrimonial Matters Requires Factual Inquiry into Continuing Wrongs.

4 May 2018

The dispute arose from matrimonial proceedings between a husband and wife. The husband filed HMP No.218 of 2009 seeking divorce on grounds of cruelty ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Petition in Property Dispute — Appointment of Court Commissioner for Measurement Upheld. The court held that appointment of a commissioner under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC is permissible to elucidate any matter in dispute, including measurement, and the revisional court should not interfere with such discretionary orders.

27 Sep 2016

The petitioner, original defendant No.1 in Special Civil Suit No.21 of 2011, challenged the order dated 2nd December 2011 passed by the learned Civil ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Builder's Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Partly Quashing Stop Construction Notice and Directing Objections Under KIAD Act. The Full Bench Reserves Judgment on 06-02-2014, but the Final Decision is Not Available in the Provided Incomplete Text.

11 Apr 2014

The case involves writ appeals filed by M/s Century Central, a registered partnership firm, challenging the order dated 02/07/2013 passed by a learned...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 224 IPC for Late Return After Parole While Upholding Curtailment Notice. Show-Cause Notice for Curtailment of Remission Is Preliminary and Not Liable to Be Quashed; Prosecution Under Section 224 IPC Requires Mens Rea and Is Not Justified When Convict Returns Within Maximum Permissible Parole Period.

14 Sep 2017

The petitioner, a convict serving a seven-year sentence for an offence under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, was lodged at ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Delivers Common Order in Writ Petitions on Disciplinary Enquiry Against Assistant Public Prosecutors. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution Challenging KSAT Orders Which Upheld Lokayukta's Enquiry Under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957.

14 May 2020

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed by Assistant Public Prosecutors-cum-Assistant Government Pleaders under Articles 226 and 227 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Order Closing Evidence in NI Act Case — Failure to Cross-Examine Complainant's Affidavit Does Not Automatically Close Defence Evidence. The court held that the accused's right to cross-examine the complainant's affidavit-in-evidence is fundamental to a fair trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the trial court's order closing evidence without granting such opportunity was premature and set aside.

9 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Shankar Lotlikar, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Municipal Council Dispute — Costs Imposed to Compensate Prejudice. Amendment to incorporate subsequent events under Section 189(6) of Maharashtra Municipal Council Act allowed to avoid multiplicity of litigation.

26 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Sau. Lata w/o Kailash Bankar, filed a suit for declaration and injunction against the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. After filing the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Postponement of Zilla Panchayat Elections Due to COVID-19 Pandemic - State Government and Election Commission Directed to Take Appropriate Decision in Public Interest

21 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Kenneth Ian Stewart Silveira, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking postponement of the Zilla...

39 40 41 42 43

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)