Search Results for "single transaction rule"

1694 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1694 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears and Decides Batch of Appeals Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Regarding Compensation for Kakhandaki Village Lands. The Court Examined Market Value Determinations Made by the Reference Court Under Sections 18 and 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Background: A batch of appeals and cross objections were filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 189...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Challenging Compensation Awards in Land Acquisition Matters. The Court Determined Market Value of Lands Acquired for a Minor Irrigation Tank in Kakhandaki Village, Bijapur District.

In the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Injunction in Bank Guarantee Invocation Dispute. Fraud Must Be Established at Invocation Stage; Bank Guarantee Is Independent Contract Between Bank and Beneficiary.

The appellant, M/s. ABG Ports Limited, filed a suit seeking a declaration that the Joint Bid Agreement (JBA), the Counter Guarantee, and its invocatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of State Tax Officer Under IGST; Confiscation of Arecanut Goods Upheld. Court Holds that Section 4 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Does Not Require Separate Notification for Cross-Empowerment of State Officers.

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern dealing in arecanut, challenged a series of orders passed by the Commercial Tax Officer (Enforcement) under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Reconsiders Validity of Appellate Side Rule on Marathi Translations After Earlier Division Bench Held It Unconstitutional. Larger Bench Examines Whether Litigants Were Heard Before Rule Declared Null and Void Under Article 348.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a practicing advocate who was prevented by the High Court Registry from filing a petition without first...