Search Results for "ownership evidence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "ownership evidence"

3156 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3156 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for De-requisition of Lands Under Requisitioning Act — Compensation Already Determined and Property Not Released. The Court held that the appellants' remedy lies in seeking compensation enhancement, not de-requisition, as the property was not released within the statutory period under Section 6(1A) of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952.

24 Nov 2020

The case involves an appeal by special leave against the Karnataka High Court's judgment dated 11.01.2008 in W.P. 8340/2006. The appellants, B.K. Ravi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Co-ownership Dispute Over Property Rights and Evidence of Power of Attorney Holder. Court holds that a constituted attorney can depose on oath on behalf of the party and that revenue records do not create title but can be used to show possession or co-ownership.

30 Sep 2005

The case involves a second appeal by the defendant against the judgment of the Additional District Judge in a suit for permanent and mandatory injunct...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Slum Land Acquisition as Barred by Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act — Preliminary Issue of Bar of Suit Decided in Favor of Defendant No.5.

12 Apr 2016

The suit was filed by the Plaintiffs seeking a declaration of ownership of a plot of land and challenging its acquisition by the State Government unde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Defendant in Property Sale Deed Dispute; Non-Payment of Balance Consideration Does Not Invalidate Sale. Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Holds that Title Passes on Registration Even if Part Payment, and Remedy for Non-Payment is Recovery of Balance, Not Cancellation of Deed.

7 Aug 2026

The dispute originated from two sale deeds dated 10.03.1975, where the original plaintiffs (a son and his mother) sold their lands to the original def...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Revision Petition and Rejects Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Plaint Based on Agreement to Sell Held Barred by Law as Agreement Does Not Create Interest in Property Under Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Injunction Suit Without Declaration of Title Not Maintainable When Title Disputed.

16 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a civil revision petition challenging the High Court's dismissal of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Title and Adverse Possession. Court holds that dismissal of restitution application under Section 144(1) CPC does not bar a fresh suit for possession based on independent title.

11 Oct 2018

The case involves a property dispute over a house and land at Survey No. 123, Block No. 276, village Atyal, taluka Gadhinglaj. The respondents (origin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Landlord Not Necessary Party in Tenant's Suit Against Corporation for Demolition. The test for necessary party under Order I Rule 10 CPC is whether the suit outcome affects the legal interest of the landlord, which is not satisfied when the tenant seeks to restrain demolition of the tenanted premises.

14 Dec 2021

The judgment involves four writ petitions where the common question is whether the owner/landlord of the suit premises is a necessary or proper party ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Trade Union in Provident Fund Coverage Dispute — Factory Held Not a Branch of Trading Firm Under Section 2A of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Common ownership and consolidation of accounts insufficient to treat two separate establishments as one integral unit for PF coverage.

3 Feb 2010

The appellant, Mumbai Mazdoor Sangh, a trade union, filed a writ appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing its...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Tenant Suit — Concurrent Findings of Subletting and Unauthorised Construction Upheld. Landlord's Suit for Possession Under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Succeeded as Tenant's Legal Heirs Failed to Prove Lawful Succession and Committed Acts of Subletting and Structural Alteration Without Consent.

12 Jul 2019

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (legal heirs of the deceased tenant) against the concurrent judgmen...

39 40 41 42 43

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)