Search Results for "ocular examination report"

676 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 676 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eye Witness and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eye witness was found to be planted and not credible.

The appellants, Waghya alias Manoj Bhaiyalal Uke and Sandip s/o Bhaiyalal Uke, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Wardha, for the murder of Pintu u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Caste-Based Murder Case — Evidence of Eyewitnesses Found Credible Despite Minor Contradictions. The Court held that the testimony of a single reliable witness is sufficient for conviction, and delay in FIR receipt does not vitiate the case if explained.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against the conviction of seven accused for the murder of Murugaiyan, a Scheduled Caste man, and for setting his h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Three Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as prosecution established chain of circumstances leading to guilt.

The appellants, original accused nos.1, 2, and 3, challenged their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Dashrath Bu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt the role of each accused in the homicidal death.

The case involves three criminal appeals and two criminal applications arising from a common judgment of the Sessions Court convicting the appellants ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Procedural Defects and Insufficient Evidence - Fundamental Error in Framing Charge Under Deleted Provision and Inconsistent Testimony Fail to Sustain Conviction Under IPC

The High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by Appellant against his conviction and life imprisonment under Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused in Murder Case Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC Established for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Family Land Dispute.

The case arises from a family land dispute between the Gholap family. The complainant and accused Nos. 1 and 2 are from the same original Gholap famil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim for Child Death — Negligence of ST Bus Driver Established. MSRTC held vicariously liable for death of 10-year-old student hit by bus at bus-stand; compensation of Rs.4,00,000 with 8% interest upheld under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of a 10-year-old boy, Parikshit Bhosale, who died after being hit by a State Transpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Penetration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Rape Allegation and Prosecution Witnesses Contradicted Each Other.

The appellant, Balaji Malhari Devkate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, District Nanded, for the offence of rape under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of 8-Year-Old Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Penetration and Witness Testimony Contained Material Contradictions.

The appellant, Balaji Malhari Devkate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, District Nanded for the rape of an 8-year-old girl unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Human Trafficking and POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Running Brothel and Exploiting Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Essential Ingredients Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Sunita @ Neha Machhindra Chandne and Sharda Machindra Chandne, were convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 370 read w...