Search Results for "international sale"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "international sale"

1184 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1184 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ESI Recovery Against Auction Purchaser in Deemed Transfer Case — Section 93-A of ESI Act Does Not Apply to Sales by Financial Corporation Under Section 29(2) of SFC Act. Auction purchaser of property from Maharashtra State Financial Corporation is not liable for prior owner's ESI arrears as the transfer is by operation of law and not by the employer.

21 Feb 2006

The petitioner, M/s. ANK Seals, a registered partnership firm, purchased a plot of land and building (U-149 in MIDC, Nagpur) in an auction sale conduc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Case — Rejects Trial Court's Finding of No Prima Facie Case. Court holds that the trial court erred in rejecting an application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC by misreading the plaint and ignoring the plaintiff's possession and title documents.

12 Jan 2024

The appellant, Nasir Khan, filed a miscellaneous first appeal under Section 104 read with Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Derivative Transaction Case. Exchange Traded Derivatives Held Not Speculative Under Section 43(5) of Income Tax Act, 1961, with Retrospective Application of Clause (d) of Proviso.

18 Apr 2011

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-IV against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in favor of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Application for Judgment on Admissions in Admiralty Suit. Plaintiff Seeks Relief Under Order XII Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Alleging Admissions by Defendants.

4 Apr 2025

The present matter concerns an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Raj Transport and Trading Company, in the pending Admiralty Suit No. 17 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Injunction Application in 'AirTel' Trademark Dispute Between Telecom and Liquor Companies. Plaintiffs Allege Passing Off and Copyright Infringement Against Defendants Using Identical Mark on Alcoholic Beverages.

21 Mar 2006

The plaintiffs, a leading telecommunications company providing mobile services under the brand 'AirTel', filed a suit against the defendants, a liquor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Decides Tax Deduction at Source Liability for Cellular Mobile Service Providers Under Income Tax Act, 1961 - The Court clarified that obligation under Section 194-H requires principal-agent relationship between payer and payee as per Section 182 of Contract Act, 1872, and payments must be for services in buying/selling goods or asset transactions, not being securities.

28 Feb 2024

The Supreme Court delivered a common judgment addressing appeals by the Revenue and assessees, who were cellular mobile telephone service providers, c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT's Remand Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Evasion of Duty Based on Undervaluation of Plywood/Block Boards. The Court Held That the Adjudicating Authority Must Provide a Reasoned Order After Proper Cross-Examination and Consideration of Evidence, and That the Tribunal's Remand for De Novo Adjudication Was Justified.

19 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) that...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Memorandum of Agreement dated 14.06.2012 Contains Valid Arbitration Clause.

2 Jan 2019

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole ...

High Court

High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute Despite Unstamped Agreement. Arbitration Clause Held Separable and Enforceable Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mr. M.N. Kumar, Mr. R. Venkata Krishna, and Mr. C.S. Mohan, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitrati...

High Court

KAHC010645132024_1

19 Dec 2025

The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...

39 40 41 42 43

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)