Search Results for "income share"

1579 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1579 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision Allowing Interest Deduction Under Section 36(1)(iii) for Dealer in Shares. Interest on Borrowed Funds for Investment in Shares Held as Stock-in-Trade is Business Expenditure, Not to be Reduced from Dividend Income Under Section 57(iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insolvency Petition Against Deceased Insolvent, Holding Proceedings Abate Upon Death. Insolvency Petition Under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 Abates as Act Does Not Permit Substitution of Legal Representatives.

The case involves an insolvency petition filed by Prime Securities Ltd. against Anil Mithalal Shah under the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Full and True Disclosure — Share Premium Valuation Dispute Not a Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, The Suminter Organic and Fair Trade Cotton Ginning Mill Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Confirms Half Share to Plaintiff. Sale Deed Executed by Father Without Legal Necessity Held Not Binding on Daughter as Coparcener Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree in R.A. No. 207/1997, which confirmed the trial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...