Search Results for "implied powers"

1129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Money Suit Due to Perverse Findings on Loan Repayment. Concurrent findings of fact set aside as courts below ignored material evidence regarding repayment of loan under Section 34 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The appellant/defendant, Madhukar alias Babanrao Ganpat Sabnis, a landlord, appealed against the concurrent decrees in a money suit filed by the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 107119 OF 2025 (APMC)

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Continued Use of Trademarks After Licence Expiry — Passing Off Action Maintainable by Partnership Firm Against Company Promoted by Partners. Licence Expiry Terminates Right to Use Trademarks; Injunction Granted Without Appointment of Receiver.

The plaintiffs, M/s. American Dry Fruit Stores (a partnership firm) and its partners Kishor H. Thakkar and Dilip H. Thakkar, filed a suit against ADF ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Civil Court Cannot Regularise Encroachment on Forest Land in Contravention of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 — Government Resolution of 1979 Cannot Override Section 2 of the Act.

This is a reference made by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kannad under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking answers to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Interim Stay on Transfer Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Transfer of Workmen During Pendency of Industrial Disputes Constitutes Prima Facie Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged an interim order dated 23rd December 2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Pune, in Complaint (ULP) No.4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Equipment Supply Dispute — Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Court Intervention. Existence of Arbitration Clause Confirmed; Court's Role Limited to Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Master Drilling India Private Limited, entered into an Equipment Supply Agreement dated 01.10.2021 with the respondent, Sarel Drill & ...