Search Results for "averment"

2037 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2037 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.

The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order Due to Illegible Documents Violating Article 22(5). Supplying illegible documents amounts to non-communication of grounds, depriving detenu of effective representation.

The petitioner, Sanjay Soni, challenged a detention order dated 25th January 2012 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in SC/ST Act Case for Lack of Caste Allegation. Complaint under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 must specifically mention caste of accused and complainant to sustain prosecution.

The petitioners, Dagadu Gorakh Patil and Atul Jayprakash Suryawanshi, were accused in RCC No.7/2012 filed by the respondent Shivaji Jethya Walvi alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Directed to Reinstate Employee with Back Wages. Abandonment of Service Claim Rejected as Employee Reported for Duty After Maternity Leave.

The present petition was filed by Finlay Mills challenging an order dated 4.12.2002 passed by the Industrial Court, Bombay in Complaint (ULP) No.169 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Revokes Leave to Sue in Summary Suit for Goods Sold and Delivered Due to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause. Article 39 of the contract required all legal proceedings only in Calcutta High Court, ousting Bombay High Court's jurisdiction.

The Plaintiff, Pacific Refractories Ltd., filed a summary suit in the Bombay High Court against the Defendant, Stein Heurtey India Projects Pvt. Ltd.,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Limitation in Property Dispute Over Incomplete Building. Plaintiff's claim for declaration of ownership and injunction held time-barred under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 as cause of action arose in 1969 when assignment deed was executed.

The plaintiff, M/s. Foreshore Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a suit in 1999 seeking a declaration that it is the owner of the entire suit la...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Husband Guilty of Contempt for Wilful Disobedience of Maintenance Order. Non-compliance with Family Court's maintenance order for over two years despite notice of contempt petition amounts to wilful disobedience under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The contempt petition was filed by the wife, Amita B Devnani, against her husband Bhagwan H Devnani and others, alleging wilful disobedience of an ord...