Search Results for "acquiring bank"

586 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 586 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Compliance with Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Lack of Pleading Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff failed to amend plaint to incorporate essential facts regarding readiness and willingness to perform contract, leading to dismissal of suit.

The plaintiff, Neeta Sawant, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 30th September 2016, by which the defendants agreed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Enhances Compensation Rate Based on Comparable Sale Deeds. Market Value Determined at Rs. 25,000 per Acre Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with 30% Solatium and 12% Additional Interest.

The appellant, Waman s/o Rajaram Gabhane, owned Survey No. 105 admeasuring 4.99 hectares at Mouza Jamb. The State acquired 40 R of this land for exten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Rate to Rs. 30,000 Per Acre with Statutory Benefits. Court Relies on Sale Deed of Similar Land and Previous Awards to Determine Market Value Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and award dated 26/08/2003 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Order in Property Dispute Due to Limitation. Delay of Over 3 Years in Challenging Ex-Parte Decree Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Held Not Sufficiently Explained.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the Plaintiff/Applicant, Smt. Gopi, widow of Tarachand R. Advani, seeking to set aside an ex-parte order ...