Madras High Court Reserved Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Filed Under Article 226 Challenging Dismissal Orders. Petitioners from Various Town Panchayats Sought Quashing of Termination Orders and Reinstatement with Backwages.
23 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Tamil Nadu Civil Service Rules"
549 result(s) found
Found 549 result(s)
High Court
High Court Quashes FIR Against School Principal in National Flag Insult Case Due to Lack of Intent and Control Over Circulated Image. Offence Under Section 2 of Prevention of Insult to National Honors Act, 1971 Not Made Out as Petitioner Had No Knowledge or Intention to Disrespect Flag, and Image Was Allegedly Edited by Students.
21 Feb 2026The dispute arose from an FIR registered against the petitioner, a school principal, under Section 2 of the Prevention of Insult to National Honors Ac...
- 513
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Removes Interim Application and Treats Guardianship Petition as One under Clause XVII of Letters Patent. Disposal of Interim Application No. 1768 of 2025 on 24 April 2025 Leads to Removal from Board.
8 May 2025The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, presided over by Justice Abhay Ahuja, took up Guardianship Petition No. 8 of 2025 along with Interim Applicati...
- 14
High Court
C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.205 of 2023
12 Mar 2025The plaintiff, VGN Projects Estates Private Limited, filed commercial suit no.205 of 2023 against the defendants, M/s. VGK Builders Pvt. Ltd. and M/s....
- 15
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner in Medical Officer Appointment Case Due to Invalid Covid-19 Experience Certificate. Weightage for Covid-19 Service Denied as Petitioner Submitted Certificate from Non-Competent Authority Outside Jurisdiction of Service.
24 Feb 2025The petitioner, a medical practitioner holding an MBBS degree and registered with the Tamil Nadu Medical Council, had rendered services in various hos...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Cancellation of Dharavi Redevelopment Tender and Upholds Fresh Tender Process. The court held that the State's decision to cancel the earlier tender and re-tender was a policy decision based on changed circumstances and not arbitrary, and that the petitioner had no vested right to the award of the contract.
20 Dec 2024The petitioner, SecLink Technologies Corporation, a company incorporated in Seychelles and lead member of a consortium, challenged the cancellation of...
- 388
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in MRTP Act Reservation Lapse Case — Purchaser Entitled to Benefit of Prior Owner's Section 49 Notice. Reservation Lapses Under Section 49(7) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 When No Acquisition Within One Year of Purchase Notice, and Benefit Enures to Subsequent Purchaser.
14 Feb 2020The Supreme Court allowed the appeals against the Bombay High Court's order which had disposed of the writ petition filed by the appellants, purchaser...
- 1507
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Students' Challenge to MHT-CET 2019 Answer Keys and Evaluation Process. Court Directs Re-evaluation of Disputed Questions and Issuance of Revised Merit Lists for Admission to Professional Courses.
11 Jul 2019The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by students who appeared for the Maharashtra Common Entrance Test (MHT-CET) 2019 for admission to profe...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Company in LTU Coverage Dispute — Three Manufacturing Units and One Trading Unit Held Covered Under Large Tax Payer Unit Scheme. Court Interprets Notification 20/2006-CE(NT) to Include All Units of a Company Once Opted for LTU, Rejecting Revenue's Restrictive Interpretation.
17 Feb 2011The petitioner, Sharda Motor Industries Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Con...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Contract for Manufacture of Pharmaceutical Products Held to be Sale, Not Works Contract Under Section 194C of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the ITAT's decision that the agreement between the assessee and the manufacturer was a contract for sale of goods, as property passed only on delivery and the agreement was on a principal-to-principal basis.
12 Mar 2010The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held t...
- 63
