Search Results for "Quota Rule"

584 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 584 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 957 OF 2013

The petitioners, retired employees of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation, along with other slum dwellers, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Disqualification Order Against Woman Sarpanch for Failure to Hold Gram Sabha Meeting on Republic Day. Interpretation of Rule 3(2) of Gram Sabha Rules Indicates Meeting Date Not Mandatory, and Onus on Officials to Guide New Electee.

The petitioner, a Scheduled Tribe woman, was directly elected Sarpanch of village Mundgaon on 20.12.2022 and assumed office on 04.01.2023. Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Retirement Benefits Withheld Due to Caste Certificate Dispute — DOPT Circular Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively Without Following Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Dilip Chintaman Nandankar, was a Development Officer appointed on 20.05.1987 in the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category in the New India Ass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MPSC Selection Process for Deputy Director, Town Planning. Petitioner's claim of eligibility based on experience as Assistant Director rejected as advertisement required specific post of Deputy Director experience.

The petitioner, Vijay Babarao Shende, a Scheduled Caste candidate, was initially appointed as Assistant Town Planner in 1993 and later as Town Planner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Irregularly Appointed Forest Officers in Seniority Dispute. Appointments Beyond Advertised Vacancies Held Illegal, Seniority Counts Only From Regularisation Date.

The case pertains to the seniority of Assistant Conservators of Forests (ACFs) in the Bihar Forest Service. The appellants were appointed on 13.04.198...