Search Results for "Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Act"

710 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 710 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Additional Alternate Land After 49-Year Delay. Writ petition seeking allotment of 80R land under Nazare Project rejected as grossly delayed and lacking explanation for laches.

The petitioner, Nana Narayan Bhalerao (since deceased, through his legal heir Jalindar Nana Bhalerao), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Awards Compensation to Victims of Meerut Fire Tragedy Due to State and Organizer Negligence. State and Organizers Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Deaths and Injuries from Fire at Victoria Park Exhibition Due to Failure to Obtain Permissions and Ensure Fire Safety.

The Supreme Court dealt with a writ petition filed by victims of a fire tragedy that occurred on April 10, 2006, at Victoria Park, Meerut, during the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Cross-Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matter — Power of Appellate Court Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Examined. The Court held that an appellate court under Section 37 cannot remand a Section 34 petition for fresh hearing but must decide the appeal on merits.

The dispute arose from a development agreement concerning a slum rehabilitation scheme in Mumbai. The appellant, Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Allotment of Balance Land to Project Displaced Person under Resettlement Act. Cancellation of Allotment Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Manik Chandru Deokar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...