Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

525 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 525 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Reinstatement Orders for Daily-Wage Employees. Termination of daily-wage employees without compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal, and reinstatement with back wages is proper remedy.

The case involves four writ petitions arising from service disputes between the Maharashtra State Khadi and Village Industries Board (the employer) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows WCL Petition in Service Dispute — Labour Court Order Under Section 33(C)(2) Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction. Claim for Higher Grade and Arrears from 1974 to 2014 Held Not Maintainable Without Prior Adjudication and Barred by Limitation.

The petitioners, Western Coalfields Limited (WCL), a Central Government undertaking, challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 5.5.2018, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Absorption Under Government Resolution After Reinstatement in EGS Service — Claim for Regularisation Rejected Due to Delay and Laches.

The petitioner, Ashok Bhikanrao Deshmukh, was appointed as a Mustering Assistant on daily wages under the Employment Guarantee Scheme (EGS) from 01.11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Challenging Reinstatement Order of Medically Unfit Driver. Corporation's Failure to Offer Alternative Employment as Per Its Circular Constituted Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, challenged the order of the Labour Court dated 30.6.1997, which directed reinstatement o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Temporary Employee Without Retrenchment Compensation. Petitioner deemed permanent under Model Standing Orders Clause 4C after completing 240 days of continuous service, termination without notice or compensation held illegal.

The petitioner, Bhagchand Garade, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 16.7.2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Bhandara, d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Petitions Against Labour Court Awards in Regularisation of Daily Wage Workers. Held that daily wage employees who completed 240 days of continuous service are entitled to permanency and regularisation under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the Commissioner of Nashik Municipal Corporation challenging the common judgment and order of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Employees of Transferred Bank Not Entitled to Pay Revision Under MOU and Settlement.

The petitioners, originally employees of Kolhapur Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., challenged a judgment of the Industrial Court at Kolhapur dismissing thei...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Retrenched Workers Seeking Reinstatement and Continuity of Service. Workers of a closed textile mill not entitled to reinstatement as closure was genuine and compensation under Section 25FFF of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was paid.

The petitioners, 42 workers of Kalmeshwar Textile Mills, challenged their retrenchment following the closure of the mill. The mill was closed due to f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transfer of Conductor in MSRTC — Transfer Upheld as Administrative Action Not Amounting to Unfair Labour Practice. Transfer of employee with history of misconduct held to be on administrative grounds and not vindictive under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Pandhari Ramrao Narwate, was employed as a Class IV Conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC). By order ...