Search Results for "Joint decree"

2773 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2773 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Courts Below Concurrently Held That Suit Property Was Joint Family Property and Plaintiffs Were Entitled to Share.

The appellants, who were the defendants in a partition suit, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit for Clubbing Properties in Different Jurisdictions. Section 17 CPC Does Not Permit a Single Suit for Separate Immovable Properties Situated in Different States.

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by the appellant (plaintiff) seeking declaration that two properties—one in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, and ano...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Petition in Rent Control Case — Reverses Appellate Order Dismissing Eviction Suit. Landlords' Bonafide Need for Demolition and Reconstruction Established Under Section 13(1)(hhh) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The petitioners, who are the landlords of the suit premises, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order of the District Judge, Solapur, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

This is a second appeal arising from a civil suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction. The appellant, Parubai Savliram Kshatriya (si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Maintainability of Motion for Setting Aside Consent Decree Alleging Fraud. Court Interprets Order 23 Rule 3A CPC and Precedent to Determine if Non-Party Can Challenge Consent Decree via Application.

Background: The dispute arose from Suit No. 1188 of 1984 concerning certain properties. Premnath, brother of original plaintiff No. 1, had been recogn...