Search Results for "Heavy Engineering case"

429 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 429 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Pipeline Laying — Laying of Pipelines for Water Supply Project Falls Under 'Erection, Commissioning or Installation Service' and Is Taxable Under Finance Act, 1994.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-VII Commissionerate, under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Finan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reduces Compensation Rate. Reference Court's enhancement of market value from Rs. 100 to Rs. 350 per sq.mt. set aside; rate reduced to Rs. 200 per sq.mt. based on comparable sale instances.

The case pertains to a State appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenging the Judgment and Award dated 12/03/2007 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Section 14 Order and Auction Under SARFAESI Act, 2002; Petitioner Alleges Violation of Natural Justice. The Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Given Available Alternate Remedy Under Section 17.

The petitioner, a sole proprietor of a knitwear unit, had availed term loan and cash credit facilities aggregating Rs. 4.55 crores from respondent no....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Employees of Transferred Bank Not Entitled to Pay Revision Under MOU and Settlement.

The petitioners, originally employees of Kolhapur Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., challenged a judgment of the Industrial Court at Kolhapur dismissing thei...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Employer's Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Under Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS). Resignation Submitted Under MVRS Was Unconditional and Could Not Be Withdrawn After Acceptance, as Per Scheme Terms Under Clause 5.1.

The dispute arose from the respondent's resignation under the Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS) introduced by the appellants, a public secto...