Search Results for "Delhi Development Authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Delhi Development Authority"

3163 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3163 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows NOIDA's Appeals and Dismisses Landowners' Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Compensation Enhanced to INR 340 per sq. yd. Based on Prior High Court Determination. The Court held that the compensation rate of INR 340 per sq. yd. determined by the High Court in earlier proceedings had attained finality and should be applied uniformly, setting aside the High Court's enhancement to INR 449 per sq. yd. in NOIDA's appeals.

15 Mar 2022

The case involves appeals by the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) and landowners against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court da...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Allottee in Slum Clearance Board Land Dispute — Plot Earmarked for Public Convenience Cannot Be Allotted to Individuals. Residents of Locality Have Locus Standi to Challenge Illegal Allotment and Unauthorized Construction.

24 Nov 2022

The case pertains to a plot (No. 25) in Thirumoolar Colony Scheme area, Chennai, which was originally earmarked for 'public convenience' under a layou...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by State Undertaking in BOT Arbitration Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award on Termination Payment. Court Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Emphasizing Finality of Arbitral Awards.

29 May 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MPRDC) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh Hi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 by Mining Lessees. Rule requiring prior approval for transfer of mining leases for minerals not in First Schedule to MMDR Act held intra vires and not inconsistent with Section 10A(2)(c) of Amendment Act 2015.

1 Dec 2016

The petitioners, holders of mining leases for minerals not specified in the First Schedule to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 as Ultra Vires Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act. Rule restricting transfer of mining leases to minerals not specified in First Schedule held inconsistent with parent Act.

1 Dec 2016

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the validity of Rule 8(1)(a) of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy M...

High Court

High Court Quashes Central Government Order Requiring Mining Company to Stop Operations and Obtain Prior Approval Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Mining Lease Renewal Not Requiring Fresh Approval Under Section 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 as Lease Area Was Already Diverted for Non-Forest Use.

29 Apr 2025

The petitioner, The Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Limited, a mining company, challenged a communication dated 29 January 2014 issued by the Ministry ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Plot Lease Forfeiture Case, Upholding UPSIDA's Cancellation Order. The forfeiture was justified due to breach of construction timelines under the lease agreement, and the High Court's refusal to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was correct as the dispute was contractual in nature.

6 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a dispute over the forfeiture of an industrial plot lease by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA). ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Property Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Title and Possession. Court holds that mere possession of property documents does not establish ownership and that plaintiffs must prove their title independently.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiffs, claiming to be owners and in possession of a plot of land in Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Retired Secretary in PWD Corruption Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act Renders Prosecution Invalid. FIR under IPC and PC Act for alleged irregularities in plot development quashed as prior sanction for prosecution of public servant was not obtained.

21 Apr 2020

The petitioner, Deodutta Gangadhar Marathe, a retired Secretary (Works) of the Public Works Department (PWD) of Maharashtra, filed a writ petition see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Airport Project Despite Procedural Lapses. Court Holds That Dispensation of Section 5A Inquiry Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Was Unjustified but Refuses to Quash Notification in Public Interest.

5 May 2017

The two writ petitions were filed by M/s. Suretech Hospital & Research Centre Limited and M/s. Vighnaharta Builders and Developers challenging land ac...

39 40 41 42 43

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)