Search Results for "Delay Condone"

1009 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1009 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Filing Written Statement — Filing of Order VII Rule 11 Application Does Not Extend Time for Written Statement Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC.

The Petitioner, a defendant in a civil suit, challenged the Trial Court's order dated 11.12.2023 rejecting his application for condonation of delay in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Substitution of Heirs in Civil Appeal. Delay of 1537 days condoned as sufficient cause shown for bringing legal representatives of deceased respondents on record in pending first appeal against decree under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The present application was filed by the applicants, Vikramsinh Kanjibhai and another, seeking condonation of delay of 1537 days in filing an applicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Due to Limitation Bar. Delay of 85 Days in Filing Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act Not Condoned for Lack of Sufficient Cause.

The present appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Restoration of Suit Dismissed for Default, Condoning Delay of Over 4 Years Due to Sufficient Cause. The Court held that the Trial Court's rejection of condonation was perverse and that a liberal approach is warranted under Order IX Rule 9 CPC and Section 5 of Limitation Act.

The petitioner, heir of the original plaintiff, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Teacher's Pension Claim Despite Shortfall in Qualifying Service. Deficiency of 4 Months Condoned Under Rule 54 and Rule 110(3) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The petitioner, a retired Assistant Teacher, was appointed on 08.08.2005 and retired on 30.04.2015 after serving for 9 years and 8 months. Although he...